Corporate Amendments: When Business Reality Requires Formalization
Change is an inherent part of any company’s trajectory. Partners join and exit, activities are adjusted, capital is revised, and management is reorganized. However, the formalization of these changes within corporate documents does not always receive the same level of attention. Whether through an amendment to the articles of association (for limited liability companies) or an amendment to the bylaws (for corporations), these instruments are what allow a company’s legal structure to align with its operational reality. Without this alignment, inconsistencies arise that can lead to significant practical obstacles. The primary function of corporate amendments is to maintain the company’s standing with the Board of Trade and other public agencies. Whenever material information—such as the membership/shareholding structure, registered address, capital stock, management, branch offices, or corporate purpose—no longer reflects reality, the company begins operating with outdated data. This misalignment typically surfaces during sensitive moments, such as banking operations, credit applications, internal reorganizations, or government audits. In these instances, the issue is not the change itself, but the lack of formal registration. Not every amendment to the articles arises from long-term planning. Many are functional amendments, aimed at regularizing events that have already occurred, such as the withdrawal of a member, a change of address, or the replacement of managers. Others, however, are strategic amendments. Companies intending to expand operations, begin exporting, access financing, or enter regulated markets must evaluate whether their corporate structure supports these moves. In such cases, the amendment ceases to be merely corrective and becomes an integral part of business planning. In Limited Liability Companies (LLCs), the Articles of Association consolidate the rules governing the relationship between members, capital, and management. Conversely, in Corporations, these provisions are organized within the Bylaws, which are subject to their own specific legal regime. While both serve to organize corporate life, the procedures, voting quorums, and formalities for amendments vary according to the entity type. Addressing these differences with care prevents rework and the rejection of filings. Amendments to capital stock represent one of the most sensitive aspects of the corporate structure. Both capital increases and reductions are legally permitted, provided that applicable statutory requirements are met. In certain scenarios—particularly during equity reorganizations—the formalization of the amendment is typically tied to the presentation of balance sheets or financial statements, ensuring greater coherence between the declared capital and the company’s economic reality. Rules regarding corporate names and corporate purposes have undergone significant adjustments over time. Requirements once treated as absolute are being reinterpreted in light of more recent administrative rulings, including favorable guidance from the Department of Business Registration and Integration (DREI). In practice, this means that criteria historically adopted by some Boards of Trade—such as the mandatory inclusion of the economic activity within the corporate name or restrictions on foreign terms—are no longer applied as uniformly as in the past. Companies that pursue corporate amendments based on obsolete practices or outdated information often face unnecessary queries, registration delays, or document rework that could have been avoided through an updated normative analysis. Amendments agreed upon only internally, without formal registration, produce negative practical effects. Among the most common impacts are difficulties in banking operations, obstacles to updating legal representatives, and challenges regarding the validity of corporate acts. Furthermore, the lack of formalization compromises legal certainty and may expose members and officers to risks that could be mitigated with an updated corporate structure. Keeping corporate instruments up to date is not merely a formality. It is a measure that contributes to legal certainty, internal organization, and the continuity of business activities. A proper assessment of necessary amendments—considering their legal and operational reflections— allows the corporate structure to evolve alongside the business, without creating unnecessary obstacles to its operation. PLBrasil Paralegal operates with a technical focus on the analysis and management of corporate amendments. We look beyond the mere registration of the instrument, considering the broader legal and operational context of the company, and ensuring strict coherence between form, content, and business reality. Do not let outdated documentation hinder your growth Formalize your corporate amendments with the agility and technical expertise of PLBrasil Paralegal. Do not let outdated documentation hinder your growth Formalize your corporate amendments with the agility and technical expertise of PLBrasil Paralegal. A equipe da Junta Comercial do Grupo PLBrasil está à disposição para auxiliá-los com os registros exigidos pelos canais abaixo: +55 (11) 3292-5050 nn@plbrasil.com.br
Foreign vessels in Brazil: CNPJ and legal representation are mandatory requirements
The presence of foreign vessels in Brazil is not limited to operational or regulatory aspects. Whenever they become involved in economic activities or enter into legal business in the country, formal obligations under Brazilian law arise. Among them, two central requirements stand out: registration in the National Register of Legal Entities (CNPJ) and the appointment of a legal representative in Brazil. Although this is a situation that applies only in specific cases, it follows a clear logic: having an economic presence in the country requires a minimum structure of identification and representation. The obligation to register with the National Register of Legal Entities (CNPJ) is not restricted to companies incorporated in Brazil. It also applies to entities domiciled abroad that have assets or carry out activities in Brazil. This arises from the events provided for in Annex I of RFB Normative Ruling No. 2,119/2022, which cover situations in which there is ownership of assets or operations in the national territory. With respect to vessels, this occurs in case of: Exploration of commercial activities in Brazilian waters; Execution of contracts with companies in Brazil; and Use of the vessel in logistics operations or provision of services. In these cases, the obligation falls on the foreign entity that owns or operates the vessel, which assumes rights and obligations in Brazil. Legal representation in Brazil is not an ancillary obligation, it is an indispensable requirement for registration of foreign entities in the CNPJ. RFB Normative Ruling No. 2,119/2022 requires foreign entities to appoint a legal representative domiciled in Brazil, with powers to receive service of process and perform acts on their behalf. In practice, this means that: The appointment of the legal representative is a condition for registration in the CNPJ; Without this structure, registration is not effective; and The vessel’s actions in Brazil become legally unfeasible. As a matter of fact, appointing a representative is an essential condition for registration before the Federal Revenue Service Office (RFB). In practice, the CNPJ serves as an operational instrument for vessels operating in Brazil. Once there are no more activities, it is common to cancel the CNPJ, reflecting the end of the legal presence in Brazil. Although registration in the CNPJ is required to start operations, the most sensitive element is the appointment of the legal representative in Brazil, considering that this is what enables registration with the Federal Revenue Service Office and ensures the continuity of the operation in Brazil. Without this structure, operation is made unfeasible due to administrative obstacles and operational impossibility. Regularization of a foreign vessel in Brazil is a layered process. While the Federal Revenue Service Office takes care of tax identity (CNPJ), other agencies regulate ownership and commercial operation: Brazilian Navy (Port Authority): It is the starting point for registration and enrollment of the vessel, in this case the Temporary Registration Certificate of the foreign-flagged vessel. ANTAQ (National Waterway Transport Agency): Once the vessel has a CNPJ and temporary registration with the Navy, ANTAQ issues the authorization of commercial operation. Registration with ANTAQ is required for shipping companies that transport cargo or passengers, focusing especially on fleet and charter authorizations. Currently, the process is mostly digital, carried out via the Electronic Information System (SEI). The requirement of legal representation in Brazil applies to several situations in which foreign entities start operations in Brazil, even on a temporary basis. This situation with vessels arises from this logic: there must be a formal connection point with the Brazilian legal system to enable operation in Brazilian territory. PLBrasil Legal Representation acts as legal representative in Brazil for foreign entities, ensuring regulatory compliance and allowing operations in the country to occur safely and predictably. Do you need to authorize a vessel to operate in Brazilian territory? We act as legal representatives and conduct the CNPJ registration procedures for vessels to operate in Brazil. Do you need to authorize a vessel to operate in Brazilian territory? We act as legal representatives and conduct the CNPJ registration procedures for vessels to operate in Brazil. The PLBrasil Group’s Foreign Capital team is available to assist you with the registrations required by the Central Bank of Brazil through the channels below: +55 (11) 3292-5050 nn@plbrasil.com.br
Inconsistencies in the Company Registration Identification Number (NIRE) and its practical impacts: risks that can compromise the company’s compliance.
Although the Company Registration Identification Number (NIRE) is a technical detail, the most relevant problems do not arise from its existence per se but from the way it is managed throughout the life of the company. In more complex business structures, failures to control this number can generate inconsistencies that affect future actions and create obstacles with the Commercial Registry. These situations are not always noticed when they arise, but they often reveal themselves during sensitive occasions, such as corporate reorganizations, requests for dissolution, audits, or operations of due diligence. One of the most common situations involves the coexistence of more than one NIRE linked to the same company. This occurs, for example, when there is an alteration in the legal nature of the Company, and the Commercial Registry assigns a new number without properly retrieving the previous history. When this happens, the company registration begins to show formal inconsistencies that impact: The consistency of the company’s registration history; The issuance of certificates; The filing of new documents; and The proof of legal continuity. In order to correct this situation, it is necessary to require acts of ratification or validation, with a thorough analysis of the history and specific administrative proceedings. Another relatively common scenario is the establishment of branches that, due to operational failure or an excess of simultaneous registrations, end up without the proper NIRE registration. Although this error can remain unnoticed for years, it usually emerges at critical moments, such as when a cancellation is requested or during merger processes. In these cases, the Commercial Registry normally requires prior regularization, through a specific corporate act, before allowing the application to proceed. This leads to delays, additional costs, and procedural uncertainty. The failure to file mandatory documents over time may lead to the deactivation of the NIRE by the Commercial Registry. When this occurs, the company faces restrictions on filing new documents, making changes, or carrying out regularization procedures. The reactivation process usually requires history survey, document updates, and procedures that are similar in complexity to a new constitution, making the solution more costly and bureaucratic. Issues involving the NIRE frequently arise in legal due diligence processes, mergers, acquisitions, or corporate reorganizations. Often, these are old errors, which solution requires the reconstruction of the registration history and the analysis of acts performed over the years. These issues may: Compromise the viability of strategic operations; Reduce the company’s attractiveness to investors; Generate additional requirements in processes of due diligence; and Significantly increase the cost of regularization. Business structures with a high number of branches are more susceptible to inconsistencies in the NIRE, especially if there have been successive changes over time, different administrative management, or a lack of centralized control. The failure in mapping the NIREs linked to each unit favors cumulative errors, which subsequently require complex corrections. The Commercial Registry does not automatically carry out a detailed preventive check of the NIRE history before assigning new registrations. For this reason, prior verification has become an essential measure in significant corporate changes, preventing future duplications and inconsistencies. This technical review allows errors to be identified before they turn into high-complexity administrative obstacles. Monitoring the NIRE registration should be integrated into the corporate governance strategy. Mapping existing records, reviewing the history of actions, and monitoring document consistency are practices that reduce risks and contribute to the company’s compliance. PLBrasil Paralegal operates in the diagnosis and organization of corporate structures, especially in cases involving extensive history, multiple branches, or the need for administrative regularization resulting from inconsistencies in the NIRE. With a technical and preventative approach, PLBrasil Paralegal assists companies in identifying risks and building legally sound and procedurally efficient solutions. Problemas com NIRE? Evite entraves e custos desnecessários! A PLBrasil Paralegal oferece suporte completo para diagnóstico e regularização societária. Problems with NIRE? Avoid unnecessary obstacles and costs! PLBrasil Paralegal offers comprehensive support for corporate diagnosis and regularization. The PLBrasil Group’s Foreign Capital team is available to assist you with the registrations required by the Central Bank of Brazil through the channels below: +55 (11) 3292-5050 nn@plbrasil.com.br
ECD 2026: definition, filing, and how to comply with the Digital Accounting Bookkeeping
The Digital Accounting Bookkeeping (ECD) is one of the main ancillary obligations of the Public Digital Bookkeeping System (SPED) in Brazil. It has a central role for ensuring transparency, traceability, and accounting compliance of companies before the Federal Revenue Service Office (RFB). Governed by RFB Normative Ruling No. 2003/2021, the ECD consolidates a company’s accounting books and financial statements into a digital format, with legal validity guaranteed by an electronic signature. In practice, it represents the formal basis of the legal entity’s accounting records and is one of the primary tools used by tax authorities for cross-referencing information. More than just a filing obligation, the ECD is a direct reflection of the quality of a company’s accounting practices. When consistently prepared, it strengthens internal controls, supports tax assessment, and reduces the risk of inconsistencies in subsequent obligations, such as the Tax Accounting Bookkeeping (ECF). According to RFB Normative Ruling No. 2003/2021, the following parties are required to file the ECD: Legal entities taxed based on Actual Profit; Legal entities taxed under the Presumed Profit regime, which may have distributed profits or dividends in an amount exceeding the tax base for Income Tax purposes, after deduction of taxes, except if they have a Cashbook as provided by law; Unincorporated Joint Venture Companies (SCP), when they fall under the legally mandatory circumstances; Legal entities that are immune or exempt, whose total revenue, donations, incentives, subsidies, contributions, aid, or equivalent income is equal to or greater than BRL 4.8 million in the calendar year; and Companies that, due to corporate or contractual requirements, must keep regular accounting records. Companies that opt for the Simplified National Tax Regime (Simples Nacional) generally remain exempt from filing the ECD, except in specific situations provided for by law. The ECD relating to calendar year 2025 must be filed by June 30, 2026, in accordance with current legislation. In the event of dissolution, total or partial spin-off, consolidation, or merger, the ECD must be filed by all legal entities involved, including those that have been dissolved, spun-off, merged, and merging entities, when applicable, observing the following deadlines: If the event takes place between January and May, the ECD must be filed by the last business day of June of the same year; If the event takes place between June and December, the ECD must be filed by the last business day of the month following the month in which the event occurred. The deadline should always be calculated based on the date of the corporate event. The ECD consolidates, in a digital environment, the company’s main accounting books, including: General Journal and its subsidiary ledgers, if any; General Ledger and its subsidiary ledgers; Daily Trial Balances and the ledger entries that substantiate the records; Balance sheets and financial statements, as applicable. All files must be digitally signed by the company’s legal representative and the responsible accountant, with valid digital certificate issued by an authority accredited to ICP-Brasil. The ECD is filed exclusively through the Validator and Signer Program (Programa Validador e Assinador – PVA) made available by the Federal Revenue Service Office within the SPED environment. All files are validated, signed, and transmitted through such system with legal security. However, this obligation does not end with the filing on the PVA. Companies must keep their accounting records duly structured, parameterized and reconciled so that the ECD is submitted in full and in accordance with the tax requirements. This requires: complete accounting closing of the fiscal year; consistent entries; audited accounting reconciliations; validated financial statements; and adherence to the SPED layout and rules. A ausência de estrutura contábil adequada pode gerar erros de validação, inconsistências nos arquivos ou até impedir a transmissão dentro do prazo legal. The Tax Accounting Bookkeeping (ECF), also a part of the SPED, uses the ECD as one of its main sources of information for calculating the Corporate Income Tax (IRPJ) and the Social Contribution on Net Profit (CSLL). Therefore, any inconsistency, omission, or error in the ECD can directly impact the ECF, thus generating rework, the need for corrections, and increasing the company’s exposure to tax audits. The reconciliation between the ECD and ECF is therefore essential to ensure tax security, consistency of information, and reduction of tax assessment risks. Filing the ECD requires more than simply fulfilling an ancillary obligation. It demands accounting organization, technical expertise in legislation, and processes prepared to consistently meet the SPED standards. PLBrasil Accounting&Finance offers full support in the planning, validation, and filing of the ECD, through an integrated approach involving accounting, systems, and tax compliance. Our team monitors the entire process to ensure that the ECD is filed on time, with technical consistency and in compliance with the requirements of the Federal Revenue Service Office. Do you need to submit the declaration? Count on us to submit the necessary documentation and register with the Central Bank of Brazil. Do you need a partner to safely fulfill your ancillary obligations? Ensure the ECD is filed with full data, technical validation and tax compliance. The PLBrasil Group’s Foreign Capital team is available to assist you with the registrations required by the Central Bank of Brazil through the channels below: +55 (11) 3292-5050 nn@plbrasil.com.br
Positive Clearance Certificate with Negative Effect: how to maintain tax compliance even with debts
A positive clearance certificate with negative effect (CPEN) is issued, without immediate enforceability, when there is an active tax debt. This occurs, for example, when the debt is being paid in installments, suspended by administrative or judicial decision, or is still within the legal payment deadline, depending on the legal deadline for payment. Although the debt exists, the legislation allows the taxpayer to be considered regular for tax purposes, provided that they fully comply with the agreed conditions. For bidding processes, financing, and contractual relationships, the CPEN produces the same practical effects as a negative certificate. A CPEN is typically issued when: · There is installment payment of tax debts in progress; · The taxpayer agreed to compliance programs, such as REFIS or special installment plans; · The enforceability of the tax credit is suspended; and · The debt is not yet due or is covered by legal deadline. The key point is meeting deadlines. If the payment plan is breached or there is a delay, the debt becomes due again and the certificate ceases to have a negative effect, immediately impacting tax compliance. The tax certificates are required in all branches of public administration: Within the federal scope, it involves taxes managed by the Federal Revenue Service and the Attorney General’s Office of the National Treasury, including taxes, social security contributions, and labor charges. At the state level, debts related to the State Goods and Services Tax (ICMS) and the Tax on Vehicle Property (IPVA) can lead to restrictions. In some states, failure to pay taxes can even negatively affect the taxpayer’s registration status, even without an active state registration. Within the municipal scope, delays in property tax or real estate tax payments are frequent causes of impediments in the issuance of certificates, often only discovered when the company needs to prove its compliance. Negotiating tax debts is a legitimate and efficient strategy for restoring tax compliance. By formalizing an installment plan, the taxpayer regains access to tax clearance certificates, preserving their operational capacity. Tax regularization campaigns often offer long payment plans and easy terms, this can be crucial for companies with accumulated liabilities. Overdue social security contributions, for example, can be renegotiated directly with the Brazilian National Institute of Social Security (INSS), especially when related to labor obligations. The absence of certificates or the existence of negative certificates, since even small debts can have significant impacts if they are not identified and addressed in time, such as: · Participation in public tenders; · Access to bank financing; · Corporate transactions and audits; · Contracts with major clients; and · Corporate restructurings. One of the biggest challenges for companies is the continuous monitoring of the fiscal situation. Forgotten obligations, taxes linked to the National Register of Legal Entities (CNPJ), or old debts can compromise compliance without prior notice. Therefore, periodic monitoring of certificates and tax liabilities allows for proactive action, timely renegotiation, and planned maintenance of tax compliance. A positive clearance certificate with negative effect is a fundamental tool for companies that have debts but wish to maintain their activities regulated and protected. More than just a document, the certificate reflects organization, risk management, and planning. PLBrasil Paralegal operates in the integrated analysis of the tax situation at the federal, state, and municipal levels, supporting companies in identifying outstanding issues, monitoring certificates, and preventing operational impacts. A technical and continuous approach allows tax compliance to be transformed into a strategic asset, and not just a one-off requirement. Do you need to submit the declaration? Count on us to submit the necessary documentation and register with the Central Bank of Brazil. Did you know that you can obtain a Positive Clearance Certificate with Negative Effect and participate in bidding processes normally? Leave the bureaucracy to our experts. The PLBrasil Group’s Foreign Capital team is available to assist you with the registrations required by the Central Bank of Brazil through the channels below: +55 (11) 3292-5050 nn@plbrasil.com.br
Central Bank of Brazil – Individuals and companies with investments abroad must file their DCBE by June 5
Do you have money invested outside Brazil? Does your company invest in in another country? So, learn all about the declaration of Brazilian capital abroad (“DCBE”) and pay attention to the deadline. Avoid disputes or problems with the Central Bank of Brazil (“BACEN”)! Have you ever thought about facing administrative proceedings or having to pay a fine for not declaring investments outside Brazil? Well, the deadline for declaring your Brazilian capital abroad has begun! f investments or assets in other countries are equal to or exceed US$100 million, it is mandatory to declare them to BACEN by June 5, 2025. It is a declaration that provides detailed information to the Brazilian authorities on foreign investments held, in custody, and/or allocated in banks, real estate, or other investments/portfolios outside the country. This information is important for the Brazilian government to monitor the economy and regulate investments and resources held abroad, ensuring fiscal transparency and preventing currency evasion and money laundering. Those who are required to submit DCBE information are required to do so four times a year, either annually or quarterly, depending on the total amount of investment outside the country, namely: • US$ 1,000,000.00 (one million US dollars) or the equivalent in other currencies, referring to the periods ending December 31 of each base year – Annual CBE; and • US$ 100,000,000.00 (one hundred million US dollars) or equivalent in other currencies, referring to the periods of March 31, June 30, and September 30 of each base year – Quarterly CBE. The DCBE is mandatory for individuals and legal entities that have investments abroad, according to the amounts described above. If you do not make the declaration, BACEN may fine you up to R$ 250,000! In addition, the declaration helps to avoid problems with the Brazilian Federal Revenue Service and other agencies. Legal basis: Law 14,286/2021 and BCB Resolution 279/2022. Do you need to submit the declaration? Count on us to submit the necessary documentation and register with the Central Bank of Brazil. Do you need to submit the declaration? Count on us to submit the necessary documentation and register with the Central Bank of Brazil. The PLBrasil Group’s Foreign Capital team is available to assist you with the registrations required by the Central Bank of Brazil through the channels below: +55 (11) 3292-5050 nn@plbrasil.com.br
Zoning in Rio de Janeiro: how Supplementary Law No. 270/2024 impacts the business operating permit
The choice of a company’s address has always been a relevant point in the incorporation process. In the Municipality of Rio de Janeiro, however, this factor gained even more importance with the entry into force of Supplementary Law No. 270/2024, later regulated by Decree No. 56.561/2025, which began to directly impact the process of issuing the operating permit. The changes introduced by the new urban regulation changed the traditional logic of the analysis of economic activities, reinforcing the need for alignment between land use and the intended business operation. What has changed with the new legislation? The new urban law redefined the Municipality’s land use and occupation criteria, changing the way residential, commercial and mixed areas are classified. In several regions of the city, especially in the central areas, there was an expansion of the mixed zones, which brought a relevant change: the analysis began to consider the compatibility of the activity with the urban environment. In practice, this means that it is not enough to verify whether the activity is planned as allowed, it is necessary to assess whether it fits the context of the region, considering factors such as flow, impact and coexistence with residential uses. This change explains why previously accepted activities began to face difficulties in obtaining permits. The importance of prior consultation with the City Hall In this context, prior consultation with the City Hall of Rio de Janeiro is no longer merely recommended but has become essential. Before acquiring or renting a property for business purposes, it is necessary to verify that the intended activity is compatible with the chosen address. This analysis involves not only zoning but also the urban criteria applicable to a specific case. When the activity is expressly prohibited, there is no room for flexibility; the consultation, in this case, only confirms the impossibility of operating in that location. On the other hand, when there is a conditioned possibility, the process requires in-depth technical evaluation. Established companies and new applications for operating permit The new legislation also brought an important distinction between already consolidated situations and new ventures. Companies that already have operating permits tend to be preserved, even if they are not fully aligned with the new rules. However, this logic does not apply in cases of a change or inclusion of business activity, a change of address, or the registration of a new CNPJ. In such cases, incompatibility with current rules may prevent the issuance of a new business permit, even for companies that previously operated in the Municipality. Constraints and need for technical analysis In practice, the City Hall of Rio de Janeiro has adopted a more restrictive stance in granting new operating permits, especially in urban-sensitive areas. This restriction, however, does not always stem from a direct prohibition. It often results from the compatibility analysis of the activity with the surroundings, which requires technical interpretation and knowledge of the applicable rules. Depending on the potential impact of the activity, it may be necessary to prepare a neighborhood impact study, as provided for in the new regulation. This type of analysis does not replace the previous consultation, but it can enable specific situations that depend on technical justification. Zoning and operating permit: prior validation as an essential requirement The changes brought by Supplementary Law No. 270/2024 reinforce an aspect that, for a long time, was treated as secondary: the alignment between business activity and urban land use. Since March 2026, the process has ceased to admit further adjustments and began to require prior validation of the viability of the activity. This means that the choice of address is no longer just a business decision and has become a determining factor for the very existence of the business in that location. Starting a process without this verification may result in unnecessary costs and the impossibility of obtaining an operating permit. PLBrasil Paralegal works in prior consultations and in the feasibility study in the Municipality of Rio de Janeiro, helping companies to make decisions based on technical criteria and in line with current urban requirements, avoiding rework and ensuring greater predictability in the process of opening or expanding activities. . Does your company comply with the new Rio Zoning? Supplementary Law No. 270/2024 changed the rules for the Permit. Avoid unnecessary costs with our Prior Feasibility Consultation.
PER/DCOMP in company liquidation: why doesn’t the procedure end with the cancellation of the National Register of Legal Entities?
When a company enters into liquidation, the focus typically falls on canceling the CNPJ, the winding down of operations and the fulfilling of immediate obligations. During this period, administrative procedures that are still ongoing, such as the Electronic Request for Refund, Reimbursement or Restitution and Compensation Statement (PERD/DCOM), are often no longer monitored. The idea that “once a company is liquidated, the matter is closed” does not apply when there are actives PER/DCOMP, whether for reimbursement or compensation. Failing to address this issue could result in financial losses and outstanding tax obligations. PER/DCOMP does not automatically close upon liquidation PER/DCOMP remains active even after the cancellation of the CNPJ; therefore, its verification should be included in the company’s closing checklist. Without monitoring, the Federal Revenue Service Office may later request documents, demand supporting evidence, or complete analyses. In practice, this monitoring can extend for up to five years, a typical timeframe for tax audits—which reinforces the need for continuous monitoring even after formal liquidation. The false sense of termination and its practical effects In many liquidation processes, the existence of pending PER/DCOMP is not verified beforehand. The process is forgotten, based on the assumption that there will be no further demonstrations. When the Revenue Service contacts the company months or years later, it becomes clear that the request was still being processed—and that there was a lack of monitoring. In other words, the problem is not with the PER/DCOMP system, but with the lack of follow-up. Requesting a refund or compensation requires ongoing tax monitoring Requests for refunds or compensation involve detailed analyses by the Revenue Service, which may include: Proof of origin of the credits; Presentation of documents from previous fiscal years; Analysis of operations; and Revisions to previously declared information. Therefore, leaving the PER/DCOMP without monitoring after liquidation exposes the company to requirements that demand technical answers and organized documentation, and the last legal representative (an individual) remains responsible for responding to summons, providing clarifications, and supplying documents until the final conclusion of the process Responsible liquidation requires attention to what remains under analysis The liquidation does not automatically terminate administrative obligations. Procedures such as PER/DCOMP continue to have effects and should be monitored until completion. Ignoring this aspect can result in financial losses or unmet tax requirements. Therefore, monitoring PER/DCOMP should be part of a responsible and thorough liquidation process. PLBrasil Accounting&Finance provides technical support for PER/DCOMP during liquidation processes, ensuring that credits and liabilities are handled correctly and that no outstanding issues remain after the liquidation is concluded. Your company has been closed, but are there tax credits to be recovered? We monitor your PER/DCOMP after the CNPJ cancellation and conduct the closure process securely.
Operating license: why this authorization is essential for businesses?
Operating license is one of the most important administrative authorizations for the regular exercise of business activities. Issued by the municipality, this document confirms that the company is authorized to operate at a specific address and that the establishment meets the applicable urban planning, health, and safety requirements. Although it is a widely known concept, the process for obtaining a permit usually involves various administrative steps, in addition to analysis by different public bodies. For this reason, municipal licensing often becomes one of the most sensitive aspects of opening or regularizing businesses. What is an operating license? The operating license is a municipal authorization that allows the exercise of an economic activity in a specific property. The license confirms that the company complies with local regulations related to land use, safety, public health and urban impact. Since these rules are defined primarily by municipal legislation, the procedure for obtaining a license can vary significantly between cities. In larger municipalities, the process tends to be more detailed and involve different stages of administrative analysis. Types of permits and licensing models Depending on the municipality and the activity performed, licensing can take different forms, including: Provisional permit: issued while other necessary licenses are still under review; and Final permit: granted after full verification of legal requirements; Permit for temporary events: issued for events, fairs or temporary shows in public or private spaces; Low-risk permit: issued when the activity does not require prior inspection before the start of operations; High-risk permit: required for establishments with a high potential for danger to safety, the environment, or health; and supplementary licenses related to the activity, such as health, environmental or safety permits. In certain situations, municipalities may grant provisional authorizations based on licenses previously granted to the property, this occurs when a company begins to occupy space within an already licensed establishment. The licensing process and the agencies involved In practice, the application for an operating license rarely depends on just one single agency. In many municipalities, the process involves technical input from different sectors of the public administration, such as: health surveillance, when the activity involves food, health, or the handling of sensitive products; environmental agencies, depending on the potential impact of the activity; municipal urban planning authorities, responsible for controlling land use; and fire department, which analyzes fire safety conditions. This multiple processing steps explain why, in some cities, the process of obtaining the permit can take months — or even more than a year — to complete. The attempt at simplification introduced by the Economic Freedom Act. With the aim of reducing bureaucracy in the business environment, Law No. 13.874/2019 was edited, known as Economic Freedom Law. Among other measures, the legislation established the possibility of waiving the requirement for a prior permit for activities classified as low risk., allowing the company to begin operations upon self-declaration. In practice, however, the application of these measures depends on the regulations of each municipality. In some cities, especially in larger urban centers, licensing remains a relatively complex procedure subject to various administrative analyses. This multiple processing steps explain why, in some cities, the process of obtaining the permit can take months — or even more than a year — to complete. Companies that operate solely on an order form Given the delays in processing applications, it is common for companies to begin operations equipped only with the operating license application form. This practice reflects an administrative reality in many municipalities, where the volume of requests and limited public resources prolong the processing of applications. However, it is important to point out that the application form does not legally replace the permit. The form does not guarantee complete protection against potential administrative measures. Consequences of not having an operating license The absence of a permit can lead to relevant administrative sanctions, as the municipality has the authority to oversee the exercise of economic activities within its territory, these activities include: administrative fines; closure of the establishment; and embargo on business activities. For this reason, municipal licensing is usually one of the first concerns in the legal and operational organization of a company. Business licensing requires planning Although often treated merely as a bureaucratic step in opening a business, the operating license is an important element of business compliance. The licensing process may involve different public bodies, technical requirements, and administrative deadlines that vary depending on the municipality and the nature of the activity performed. PLBrasil Paralegal monitors processes related to licensing and regulation of business activities, analyzing not only the process of obtaining an operating license, but also other administrative authorizations that may impact the proper exercise of economic activities. Do you need to apply for a operating license?
Cancellation of beneficial ownership filings by the Federal Revenue Service: What it means in practice
The enactment of RFB Normative Instruction No. 2,290/2025 brought immediate practical impacts on administrative proceedings for the disclosure of ultimate beneficial owners currently pending before the Federal Revenue Service. Chief among these is the automatic cancellation of all filings submitted through October 2025, requiring that information be resubmitted in accordance with the new regulations. This administrative shift is directly linked to the restructuring of procedures and the implementation of the Digital Beneficial Ownership Form (e-BEF), which has centralized the submission of information within the National Registry of Legal Entities (CNPJ) framework. Cancellation of Previously Filed Proceedings With the entry into force of RFB IN No. 2,290/2025, all beneficial ownership filings that were under review or pending a decision as of October 2025 were cancelled by the Federal Revenue Service. This includes cases where: The beneficial owner had already been disclosed; The analysis was currently underway; and The filing was awaiting supplemental information or an administrative decision. This measure stems from the need to align proceedings with the new regulatory and systemic model, as announced by the Federal Revenue Service in an institutional notice published on October 31, 2025, regarding the issuance of RFB IN No. 2,290/2025 and the expansion of registration transparency rules. Resubmission of Information: Starting the Process Anew Following the cancellation, taxpayers must initiate a new proceeding, ensuring full compliance with the requirements of RFB IN No. 2,290/2025. This means that: The procedure begins from scratch via the e-BEF; The option to declare the “non-existence” of a beneficial owner is no longer available; and The system now requires the effective identification of natural persons classified as ultimate beneficial owners. Administrative update, not penalty The cancellation of these filings should not be interpreted as a sanction, but rather as a natural consequence of a structural update to the Federal Revenue Service’s registration control mechanisms. Regulatory and technological shifts of this magnitude typically require the suspension of legacy workflows to ensure information consistency, security, and integrity. The adoption of a new electronic form and the removal of previously permitted exceptions are part of a modernization process aimed at aligning with international transparency standards. Technical support for new proceedings Given the cancellation of prior filings, it is recommended that companies and entities, among other measures, review their corporate structures and chains of control; align the identification of beneficial owners with the new requirements; Properly prepare the resubmission of information through the e-BEF. PLBrasil Paralegal is prepared to provide technical support in this new cycle, assisting in the analysis, structuring, and resubmission of beneficial ownership filings, with a focus on compliance, legal certainty, and operational efficiency. Was Your beneficial ownership filing canceled? Do not take risks. The Federal Revenue Service has canceled all legacy filings. Ensure your resubmission is handled correctly via the new e-BEF with technical support to avoid the suspension of your CNPJ.